| A | B | |||||||||||
| + | ||||||||||||
| → | ||||||||||||
| C | D | |||||||||||
| + | ||||||||||||
| Aromatic | ||||||
| DFT/B3LYP | Compund | Reference | Reference | Reference | DE | ASE |
| 6-31+G(d,p) | A | B | C | D | (Hartrees) | (kcal/mol) |
| X = C | -540.7294629 | -581.2506242 | -580.0220427 | -541.9329119 | 0.0251325 | 15.77 |
| X = Si | -792.1829124 | -832.6885311 | -831.4735859 | -793.3771357 | 0.0207219 | 13.003 |
| X = Ge | -2577.7275553 | -2618.2073014 | -2617.0189819 | -2578.8931865 | 0.0226883 | 14.24 |
All the structures of the molecules contained in this work were each optimized in Gaussian 03 using HF/6-31+G(d,p) and B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) levels of ab initio theory. Another computational chemistry technique utilized to probe the aromatic behavior of the compound in question and its corresponding reference molecules is the Nucleus Independent Chemical Shift (NICS) methodology developed by Schleyer. The NICS value of a probe (Bq) atom centered at one angstrom above the molecular plane measures the shielding or deshielding tendency of a molecule exposed to a magnetic field due to aromatic pi-electron delocalization. Amnon Stanger's suggestion that performing a NICS scan may further elucidate the aromatic behavior of a compound was also examined for each molecule in every Isotopological Homodesmotic Reaction.